Days Until Our
2023 Conference!

Accelerating resiliency planning in communities across the Commonwealth

Search

The attitude-behavior gap on climate action: How can it be bridged?

Home » Community Action » The attitude-behavior gap on climate action: How can it be bridged?

The attitude-behavior gap on climate action: How can it be bridged?

Home » Community Action » The attitude-behavior gap on climate action: How can it be bridged?

The attitude-behavior gap on climate action: How can it be bridged?There are many ways that people can take action to reduce climate change, from personal behaviors like eating a more plant-rich diet to collective behaviors like political activism. Political activism (such as contacting government officials to express support for pro-climate policies) is one of the most significant ways to influence government policy-making.

However, relatively few Americans engage in political actions to limit global warming, such as signing petitions, volunteering, or contacting government officials. While majorities think that global warming should be a high government priority and support various climate policies, there is a discrepancy between the public’s attitudes about climate action and their behaviors or actions that support it. Research that offers insights into this “attitude-behavior gap” can identify opportunities to reduce the gap and thereby strengthen both public and political will.

This analysis investigates the attitude-behavior gap on political climate action using the six most recent waves of the Climate Change in the American Mind surveys spanning 2021–2023 (n = 6,190 U.S. adults). The analysis focuses on four political actions: (1) signing a petition about global warming, either online or in person; (2) donating money to an organization working on global warming; (3) volunteering time to an organization working on global warming; and (4) writing letters, emailing, or phoning government officials about global warming. Respondents were asked about their willingness to engage in each of the behaviors and, separately, how many times they had done them over the prior 12 months. Comparisons are made gap between willingness to engage versus self-reported behavior across all four actions, and differences explored between Americans who are willing and active and those who are willing but inactive.

Click here to view the report.

Climate Change in the American Mind is conducted jointly by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication.

Become a Member
Become a Sponsor
Become a Volunteer

Sign Up for E-News

Get news and notifications from Resilient Virginia.

The Resilience Calendar

  • Exploring the Ethics and Societal Interactions of Climate Intervention
    Date: November 21, 2024
    Location: Virtual

    The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) will be hosting a series of workshops in October and November 2024 on the ethical and social dynamics of climate intervention technologies. NSF is looking for social scientists,…

  • Zoning for More Equitable Housing Options: Lessons from Charlottesville, Virginia
    Date: November 21, 2024
    Location: Virtual

    This webinar will explore land use and zoning’s impact on equity and affordable housing. The focus will be a case study of the process known as Cville Plans Together, and how Charlottesville, Virginia…

  • Post-Election Debrief: Opportunities for Science Advocacy
    Date: November 21, 2024
    Location: Virtual

    The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) is facilitating a training webinar to highlight timely ways for scientists and science advocates to get involved in equitable, science-based advocacy over the weeks and months after the 2024…

  • Leaders in Energy Circular Economy Working Group Meeting
    Date: November 27, 2024
    Location: Virtual

    Register for event here

    From the Leader's in Energy website: "Join us for our Circular Economy Working Group meetings which are held on…

Latest News & Resources

Public Assistance Grants

When an area has received a Presidential declaration of an emergency or major disaster, then its state, tribal, territorial and local governments — and certain types of private non-profits — may be eligible to apply for Public Assistance (PA).

Read More »

Fire Management Assistance Grants (FMAG)

Fire Management Assistance Grant (FMAG) Program is available to states, local and tribal governments, for the mitigation, management, and control of fires on publicly or privately owned forests or grasslands, which threaten such destruction as would constitute a major disaster.

Read More »

Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)

FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program provides funding to state, local, tribal and territorial governments so they can develop hazard mitigation plans and rebuild in a way that reduces, or mitigates, future disaster losses in their communities.

Read More »